Today I read an article by a journalist with quotes by analysts about Linux
and how difficult that it will be to move to Linux from Windows and from UNIX
in some cases. Then there is this book written by someone named Kenneth Brown
based on a study of Linux and its derivation. Mr. Brown says that Linux may
have been derived from UNIX and that some open source types do not respect
others IP.
UNIX code is in various operating systems. In the early 1980s when I was
learning to be a UNIX kernel programmer, I picked up a copy of Lyon's
annotated UNIX book. His book had the source code for one of the early
releases of UNIX from Bell Labs along with a description of what many of the
C statements meant. Anyone could have used that code and most likely did.
So, what is really new here? Basically, nothing as far as I can tell. We
already know that Bell Labs code was the basis ... (more)
In the past two days, Novell has made two important Linux-related
announcements - the release of its Connector for Microsoft Exchange Server
to open source and expansion of its Premium Service support for Linux.
The release of Connector makes the entire Evolution product available as open
source under the GPL license. This is a good move for Novell because it is
important to provide a product that allows Linux users to collaborate with
Windows users with respect to e-mail, scheduling meetings, etc. without
having to spend an additional $69 for the Connector. The Connector may have... (more)
On Monday, Linus Torvalds announced that software developers making
contributions to Linux would have to “sign their work” and “vouch for
its origin” via a Developer’s Certificate of Origin. Linus claims that
the Developer’s Certification of Origin is needed primarily as a trail of
documentation that makes developers accountable for the code that they write
for Linux. In other words, there is a need to associate code with a
contributor.
This announcement is driven primarily by the SCO lawsuit against IBM.
However, it is my view that corporate enterprise users would have eventuall... (more)
I don’t get it. Sun is still trying to go against market trends and push
Solaris on SPARC when many customers want Linux. Sun has a wonderful volume
server business with Solaris on SPARC. In fact, Sun has lowered its
SPARC-based volume server prices so much that it can compete on price with
some of Dell’s offerings. And some of Sun’s middleware products are
included.
But many users want Linux. Linux server sales are growing by at least 30%-35%
per year. Users are interested in Linux for a number of reasons: they don’t
want to be locked in to proprietary hardware; they know that i... (more)
In the past day or two, a Sun executive - president and COO Jonathan Schwartz
- announced again Sun’s intent to open source the Solaris operating system.
This is not the first time that this topic has been recently aired.
I also heard this from a couple of Sun executives at the Sun analyst summit
in San Francisco in February 2004. In January 2000, Sun began publicly
speaking about making Solaris 8 source code available to developers/users. At
that time, Sun decided to distribute source code over the Internet or on CD.
Developers/hardware vendors that used the code to commercially d... (more)